Put Warrant Pricing
고지 사항: 이 백서는 영어 버전이 공식 문서입니다. 다른 언어 버전은 참고용입니다。
Overview
섹션 제목: “Overview”Put Warrant pricing follows similar principles to Call Warrants but with inverse directional characteristics. The price reflects the market’s expectation of downside risk.
Price Interpretation
섹션 제목: “Price Interpretation”What Does the Price Mean?
섹션 제목: “What Does the Price Mean?”A Put Warrant price of $0.25 can be interpreted as:
| Interpretation | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Implied Probability | ~25% chance underlying falls below strike |
| Hedge Cost | Pay $0.25 to protect $1.00 of downside |
| Premium Yield | Writers earn 25% premium for taking downside risk |
Pricing Factors
섹션 제목: “Pricing Factors”1. Intrinsic Value
섹션 제목: “1. Intrinsic Value”Intrinsic Value = max(0, (Strike - Current Valuation) / Strike)
Example:Current Valuation: $150B (Oracle)Strike: $180BIntrinsic Value = ($180B - $150B) / $180B = 16.7%
Minimum warrant price ≈ $0.167 (plus any time value)2. Time Value
섹션 제목: “2. Time Value”For puts, time value reflects probability of favorable (downward) movement:
Put Time Value Factors:├── More time → Higher time value (more chance to decline)├── Higher volatility → Higher time value├── Higher interest rates → Slightly lower put value└── Distance from strike → Non-linear impact3. Volatility Premium
섹션 제목: “3. Volatility Premium”Put writers demand higher premiums for volatile underlyings:
| Volatility Level | Premium Multiplier |
|---|---|
| Low (< 30%) | 1.0x |
| Medium (30-50%) | 1.2x |
| High (50-70%) | 1.5x |
| Very High (> 70%) | 2.0x |
Put Premium Pricing
섹션 제목: “Put Premium Pricing”Writer’s Perspective
섹션 제목: “Writer’s Perspective”Put writers (platform pool + KYB writers) price puts based on:
Put Premium = Base Rate + Risk Premium + Time Premium + Liquidity Premium
Where:Base Rate = Risk-free rate × Time (5% annualized)Risk Premium = f(Volatility, Strike Distance, Underlying Quality)Time Premium = f(Days to Expiry)Liquidity Premium = f(Pool Depth, Demand)Expected Yield Matrix
섹션 제목: “Expected Yield Matrix”| Strike Distance | 3 Month | 6 Month | 12 Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATM (0%) | 8-12% | 15-20% | 25-35% |
| OTM-10% | 5-8% | 10-15% | 18-25% |
| OTM-20% | 3-5% | 6-10% | 12-18% |
Yields are annualized. Actual returns depend on outcome.
Premium Calculation Example
섹션 제목: “Premium Calculation Example”Scenario: SpaceX Put at $150B Strike
섹션 제목: “Scenario: SpaceX Put at $150B Strike”Inputs:├── Current Valuation: $180B├── Strike: $150B (17% OTM)├── Time to Expiry: 6 months├── Implied Volatility: 50%└── Risk-free Rate: 5%
Premium Calculation:├── Base Rate: 5% × 0.5 = 2.5%├── Volatility Premium: 50% × 0.3 = 15%├── Strike Distance Discount: -17% × 0.5 = -8.5%├── Liquidity Premium: +2%└── Total Premium: ~11%
Put Warrant Price: ~$0.11 per tokenYield for Writer
섹션 제목: “Yield for Writer”If writer sells $100K notional of puts:├── Collateral required: $100K USDC├── Premium received: $11K (11%)├── Time period: 6 months└── Annualized yield: 22%
Outcome A (OTM - SpaceX stays above $150B):├── Writer keeps premium: +$11K├── Collateral returned: $100K└── Total return: +11% (22% annualized)
Outcome B (ITM - SpaceX at $120B):├── Premium received: +$11K├── Payout to buyers: -$20K [($150B-$120B)/$150B × $100K]├── Net P&L: -$9K└── Total return: -9%AMM Price Discovery
섹션 제목: “AMM Price Discovery”Pool Mechanics
섹션 제목: “Pool Mechanics”Put warrant pools use the same CPMM as calls:
x × y = k
Where:x = Put warrant token reservey = USDC reservePrice Dynamics
섹션 제목: “Price Dynamics”Put Price Increases When:├── More buyers (demand for protection)├── Bad news about underlying├── Market-wide risk-off sentiment├── Approaching exercise window└── Writers withdraw liquidity
Put Price Decreases When:├── More sellers (holders taking profits)├── Good news about underlying├── Market-wide risk-on sentiment├── Long time to expiry└── Writers add liquidityPut-Call Relationship
섹션 제목: “Put-Call Relationship”Theoretical Parity
섹션 제목: “Theoretical Parity”In efficient markets, put and call prices are related:
C + PV(K) = P + S
Rearranged for Put:P = C + PV(K) - S
For PIPO (simplified):Put Price ≈ Call Price + Strike Discount - Valuation PremiumPractical Implications
섹션 제목: “Practical Implications”| Market Condition | Put vs Call |
|---|---|
| Bullish consensus | Calls expensive, puts cheap |
| Bearish consensus | Puts expensive, calls cheap |
| Neutral/uncertain | Similar pricing |
| High volatility | Both expensive |
Pricing Examples
섹션 제목: “Pricing Examples”Example 1: ATM Put
섹션 제목: “Example 1: ATM Put”Underlying: SpaceXOracle Valuation: $180BStrike: $180B (ATM)Time to Expiry: 6 months
Components:├── Intrinsic Value: $0.00├── Time Value: ~$0.28├── Volatility Premium: ~$0.07└── Total Price: ~$0.35
Interpretation:- 35% probability SpaceX drops below $180B- Hedgers pay 35% to protect against declineExample 2: OTM Put (Cheap Hedge)
섹션 제목: “Example 2: OTM Put (Cheap Hedge)”Underlying: SpaceXOracle Valuation: $180BStrike: $150B (17% OTM)Time to Expiry: 6 months
Components:├── Intrinsic Value: $0.00├── Time Value: ~$0.08├── Volatility Premium: ~$0.03└── Total Price: ~$0.11
Interpretation:- 11% probability SpaceX drops below $150B- Cheap tail-risk protection- High leverage if disaster occursExample 3: ITM Put (After Down-Round)
섹션 제목: “Example 3: ITM Put (After Down-Round)”Underlying: SpaceXOracle Valuation: $150B (down from $180B)Strike: $180BTime to Expiry: 3 months
Components:├── Intrinsic Value: ~$0.17 [($180B-$150B)/$180B]├── Time Value: ~$0.08└── Total Price: ~$0.25
Interpretation:- Already profitable, can exercise in next window- Time value reflects chance of further declineWriter Dashboard Pricing
섹션 제목: “Writer Dashboard Pricing”Premium Opportunities
섹션 제목: “Premium Opportunities”┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ PUT WRITING OPPORTUNITIES │├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ ││ Underlying Strike Expiry Premium Ann. Yield ││ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ││ SpaceX $150B Q42025 11.2% 22.4% ││ SpaceX $160B Q42025 14.5% 29.0% ││ OpenAI $60B Q22026 18.3% 18.3% ││ Stripe $50B Q32025 9.8% 39.2% ││ ││ Sorted by: [Yield ▼] [Risk] [Expiry] [Underlying] ││ ││ [View Details] [Write Put] ││ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Dynamic Premium Adjustment
섹션 제목: “Dynamic Premium Adjustment”Event-Driven Pricing
섹션 제목: “Event-Driven Pricing”| Event | Premium Impact |
|---|---|
| Funding round announced | -20% (bullish signal) |
| IPO filing | -30% (liquidity coming) |
| Key executive departure | +50% (uncertainty) |
| Lawsuit/regulatory action | +100% (risk spike) |
| Down-round rumor | +75% (validation of bears) |
Automated Adjustment
섹션 제목: “Automated Adjustment”Premium Adjustment Algorithm:├── Monitor news feeds (RSS, Twitter, Bloomberg)├── Sentiment analysis scoring├── If significant event detected:│ ├── Calculate sentiment impact│ ├── Adjust pool parameters│ └── New premium = Base × (1 + Impact Score)└── Manual override by Oracle Committee if neededRisk Metrics for Writers
섹션 제목: “Risk Metrics for Writers”Greeks (Simplified)
섹션 제목: “Greeks (Simplified)”| Greek | Put Impact | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Delta | -0.3 to -0.7 | Sensitivity to underlying |
| Theta | Positive | Time decay benefits writer |
| Vega | Negative | Volatility spike hurts writer |
| Gamma | Context-dependent | Acceleration of delta |
Risk Dashboard
섹션 제목: “Risk Dashboard”┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ WRITER RISK METRICS │├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ ││ Position: SPACEX-PUT-150B-Q42025 ($100K written) ││ ││ Greeks: ││ ├── Delta: -0.35 (lose $35K per 10% drop) ││ ├── Theta: +$150/day (earn from time decay) ││ ├── Vega: -$800 per 1% vol increase ││ └── Gamma: -0.02 ││ ││ Scenarios: ││ ├── SpaceX +10%: +$11K (keep premium) ││ ├── SpaceX flat: +$11K (keep premium) ││ ├── SpaceX -10%: +$8K (partial premium) ││ ├── SpaceX -20%: -$2K (small loss) ││ └── SpaceX -30%: -$12K (significant loss) ││ ││ Breakeven: $139B valuation (-22.8% from current) ││ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘API Reference
섹션 제목: “API Reference”Get Put Quote (Buyer)
섹션 제목: “Get Put Quote (Buyer)”const quote = await pipo.getQuote({ warrant: 'SPACEX-PUT-150B-Q42025', side: 'BUY', amount: 1000});
// Response{ premium: 110.50, // USDC total pricePerToken: 0.1105, impliedYield: 22.1, // % annualized (for writer) breakeven: 139000000000, // $139B maxPayout: 1000, // USDC if valuation goes to $0 fee: 0.33 // USDC (0.3%)}Submit Put Write (Writer)
섹션 제목: “Submit Put Write (Writer)”const tx = await pipo.writePut({ underlying: 'SPACEX', strike: 150000000000, // $150B expiry: 'Q42025', notional: 100000, // $100K minPremium: 10000 // Accept at least $10K premium});
// Response{ txHash: '0x...', collateralLocked: 100000, premiumReceived: 11200, annualizedYield: 22.4, tokensIssued: 100000, expiryDate: '2025-12-31'}