Put Warrant Pricing
免責事項: このホワイトペーパーは英語版が正式な文書となります。他言語の翻訳は参照用です。
Overview
Section titled “Overview”Put Warrant pricing follows similar principles to Call Warrants but with inverse directional characteristics. The price reflects the market’s expectation of downside risk.
Price Interpretation
Section titled “Price Interpretation”What Does the Price Mean?
Section titled “What Does the Price Mean?”A Put Warrant price of $0.25 can be interpreted as:
| Interpretation | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Implied Probability | ~25% chance underlying falls below strike |
| Hedge Cost | Pay $0.25 to protect $1.00 of downside |
| Premium Yield | Writers earn 25% premium for taking downside risk |
Pricing Factors
Section titled “Pricing Factors”1. Intrinsic Value
Section titled “1. Intrinsic Value”Intrinsic Value = max(0, (Strike - Current Valuation) / Strike)
Example:Current Valuation: $150B (Oracle)Strike: $180BIntrinsic Value = ($180B - $150B) / $180B = 16.7%
Minimum warrant price ≈ $0.167 (plus any time value)2. Time Value
Section titled “2. Time Value”For puts, time value reflects probability of favorable (downward) movement:
Put Time Value Factors:├── More time → Higher time value (more chance to decline)├── Higher volatility → Higher time value├── Higher interest rates → Slightly lower put value└── Distance from strike → Non-linear impact3. Volatility Premium
Section titled “3. Volatility Premium”Put writers demand higher premiums for volatile underlyings:
| Volatility Level | Premium Multiplier |
|---|---|
| Low (< 30%) | 1.0x |
| Medium (30-50%) | 1.2x |
| High (50-70%) | 1.5x |
| Very High (> 70%) | 2.0x |
Put Premium Pricing
Section titled “Put Premium Pricing”Writer’s Perspective
Section titled “Writer’s Perspective”Put writers (platform pool + KYB writers) price puts based on:
Put Premium = Base Rate + Risk Premium + Time Premium + Liquidity Premium
Where:Base Rate = Risk-free rate × Time (5% annualized)Risk Premium = f(Volatility, Strike Distance, Underlying Quality)Time Premium = f(Days to Expiry)Liquidity Premium = f(Pool Depth, Demand)Expected Yield Matrix
Section titled “Expected Yield Matrix”| Strike Distance | 3 Month | 6 Month | 12 Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATM (0%) | 8-12% | 15-20% | 25-35% |
| OTM-10% | 5-8% | 10-15% | 18-25% |
| OTM-20% | 3-5% | 6-10% | 12-18% |
Yields are annualized. Actual returns depend on outcome.
Premium Calculation Example
Section titled “Premium Calculation Example”Scenario: SpaceX Put at $150B Strike
Section titled “Scenario: SpaceX Put at $150B Strike”Inputs:├── Current Valuation: $180B├── Strike: $150B (17% OTM)├── Time to Expiry: 6 months├── Implied Volatility: 50%└── Risk-free Rate: 5%
Premium Calculation:├── Base Rate: 5% × 0.5 = 2.5%├── Volatility Premium: 50% × 0.3 = 15%├── Strike Distance Discount: -17% × 0.5 = -8.5%├── Liquidity Premium: +2%└── Total Premium: ~11%
Put Warrant Price: ~$0.11 per tokenYield for Writer
Section titled “Yield for Writer”If writer sells $100K notional of puts:├── Collateral required: $100K USDC├── Premium received: $11K (11%)├── Time period: 6 months└── Annualized yield: 22%
Outcome A (OTM - SpaceX stays above $150B):├── Writer keeps premium: +$11K├── Collateral returned: $100K└── Total return: +11% (22% annualized)
Outcome B (ITM - SpaceX at $120B):├── Premium received: +$11K├── Payout to buyers: -$20K [($150B-$120B)/$150B × $100K]├── Net P&L: -$9K└── Total return: -9%AMM Price Discovery
Section titled “AMM Price Discovery”Pool Mechanics
Section titled “Pool Mechanics”Put warrant pools use the same CPMM as calls:
x × y = k
Where:x = Put warrant token reservey = USDC reservePrice Dynamics
Section titled “Price Dynamics”Put Price Increases When:├── More buyers (demand for protection)├── Bad news about underlying├── Market-wide risk-off sentiment├── Approaching exercise window└── Writers withdraw liquidity
Put Price Decreases When:├── More sellers (holders taking profits)├── Good news about underlying├── Market-wide risk-on sentiment├── Long time to expiry└── Writers add liquidityPut-Call Relationship
Section titled “Put-Call Relationship”Theoretical Parity
Section titled “Theoretical Parity”In efficient markets, put and call prices are related:
C + PV(K) = P + S
Rearranged for Put:P = C + PV(K) - S
For PIPO (simplified):Put Price ≈ Call Price + Strike Discount - Valuation PremiumPractical Implications
Section titled “Practical Implications”| Market Condition | Put vs Call |
|---|---|
| Bullish consensus | Calls expensive, puts cheap |
| Bearish consensus | Puts expensive, calls cheap |
| Neutral/uncertain | Similar pricing |
| High volatility | Both expensive |
Pricing Examples
Section titled “Pricing Examples”Example 1: ATM Put
Section titled “Example 1: ATM Put”Underlying: SpaceXOracle Valuation: $180BStrike: $180B (ATM)Time to Expiry: 6 months
Components:├── Intrinsic Value: $0.00├── Time Value: ~$0.28├── Volatility Premium: ~$0.07└── Total Price: ~$0.35
Interpretation:- 35% probability SpaceX drops below $180B- Hedgers pay 35% to protect against declineExample 2: OTM Put (Cheap Hedge)
Section titled “Example 2: OTM Put (Cheap Hedge)”Underlying: SpaceXOracle Valuation: $180BStrike: $150B (17% OTM)Time to Expiry: 6 months
Components:├── Intrinsic Value: $0.00├── Time Value: ~$0.08├── Volatility Premium: ~$0.03└── Total Price: ~$0.11
Interpretation:- 11% probability SpaceX drops below $150B- Cheap tail-risk protection- High leverage if disaster occursExample 3: ITM Put (After Down-Round)
Section titled “Example 3: ITM Put (After Down-Round)”Underlying: SpaceXOracle Valuation: $150B (down from $180B)Strike: $180BTime to Expiry: 3 months
Components:├── Intrinsic Value: ~$0.17 [($180B-$150B)/$180B]├── Time Value: ~$0.08└── Total Price: ~$0.25
Interpretation:- Already profitable, can exercise in next window- Time value reflects chance of further declineWriter Dashboard Pricing
Section titled “Writer Dashboard Pricing”Premium Opportunities
Section titled “Premium Opportunities”┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ PUT WRITING OPPORTUNITIES │├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ ││ Underlying Strike Expiry Premium Ann. Yield ││ ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ││ SpaceX $150B Q42025 11.2% 22.4% ││ SpaceX $160B Q42025 14.5% 29.0% ││ OpenAI $60B Q22026 18.3% 18.3% ││ Stripe $50B Q32025 9.8% 39.2% ││ ││ Sorted by: [Yield ▼] [Risk] [Expiry] [Underlying] ││ ││ [View Details] [Write Put] ││ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Dynamic Premium Adjustment
Section titled “Dynamic Premium Adjustment”Event-Driven Pricing
Section titled “Event-Driven Pricing”| Event | Premium Impact |
|---|---|
| Funding round announced | -20% (bullish signal) |
| IPO filing | -30% (liquidity coming) |
| Key executive departure | +50% (uncertainty) |
| Lawsuit/regulatory action | +100% (risk spike) |
| Down-round rumor | +75% (validation of bears) |
Automated Adjustment
Section titled “Automated Adjustment”Premium Adjustment Algorithm:├── Monitor news feeds (RSS, Twitter, Bloomberg)├── Sentiment analysis scoring├── If significant event detected:│ ├── Calculate sentiment impact│ ├── Adjust pool parameters│ └── New premium = Base × (1 + Impact Score)└── Manual override by Oracle Committee if neededRisk Metrics for Writers
Section titled “Risk Metrics for Writers”Greeks (Simplified)
Section titled “Greeks (Simplified)”| Greek | Put Impact | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Delta | -0.3 to -0.7 | Sensitivity to underlying |
| Theta | Positive | Time decay benefits writer |
| Vega | Negative | Volatility spike hurts writer |
| Gamma | Context-dependent | Acceleration of delta |
Risk Dashboard
Section titled “Risk Dashboard”┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ WRITER RISK METRICS │├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ ││ Position: SPACEX-PUT-150B-Q42025 ($100K written) ││ ││ Greeks: ││ ├── Delta: -0.35 (lose $35K per 10% drop) ││ ├── Theta: +$150/day (earn from time decay) ││ ├── Vega: -$800 per 1% vol increase ││ └── Gamma: -0.02 ││ ││ Scenarios: ││ ├── SpaceX +10%: +$11K (keep premium) ││ ├── SpaceX flat: +$11K (keep premium) ││ ├── SpaceX -10%: +$8K (partial premium) ││ ├── SpaceX -20%: -$2K (small loss) ││ └── SpaceX -30%: -$12K (significant loss) ││ ││ Breakeven: $139B valuation (-22.8% from current) ││ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘API Reference
Section titled “API Reference”Get Put Quote (Buyer)
Section titled “Get Put Quote (Buyer)”const quote = await pipo.getQuote({ warrant: 'SPACEX-PUT-150B-Q42025', side: 'BUY', amount: 1000});
// Response{ premium: 110.50, // USDC total pricePerToken: 0.1105, impliedYield: 22.1, // % annualized (for writer) breakeven: 139000000000, // $139B maxPayout: 1000, // USDC if valuation goes to $0 fee: 0.33 // USDC (0.3%)}Submit Put Write (Writer)
Section titled “Submit Put Write (Writer)”const tx = await pipo.writePut({ underlying: 'SPACEX', strike: 150000000000, // $150B expiry: 'Q42025', notional: 100000, // $100K minPremium: 10000 // Accept at least $10K premium});
// Response{ txHash: '0x...', collateralLocked: 100000, premiumReceived: 11200, annualizedYield: 22.4, tokensIssued: 100000, expiryDate: '2025-12-31'}